Title creep is today's word of the day. I am not claiming this as an original, although it certainly fills a semantic space, but it has been used before - in 2006 - in the Kinesthesis Breakthrough blog. There was an article in the March 2005 issue of Atlantic Monthly by Cullen Murphy (you have to pay for the full article) and a blog posting about it in AC/OS too.
In higher education, title creep is evident. This can take the form of acquisition of additional titles, or an extension of titular style, or invention of new titles. For example, "Director, Finance and Chief Financial Officer." The addition of a second and more impressive title represents a double title creep.
I am surprised that there is not more use of the term title creep, given its growing prevalence, and recommend the wonderful article by Cullen Murphy - if you are at a university, you can read it via one of many journal aggregations. Although if you are at a university, you will know all about it. As Mr Murphy suggests "Universities are adding honorific modifiers like sundae toppings to the names of professorships." There will be a longer posting on this tomorrow.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Derek Whitehead
What this blog is for
This is a blog which started in 2007 when I was standing for election as vice president of ALIA (the Australian Library and Information Association) - to communicate with members and canvas issues. It also continued during my year as president, which ended in May 2009.
It morphed into a more general blog, and I used it to communicate on a variety of issues - libraries, copyright, the internet, but particularly, just words. Over time, it became a blog mainly about language.
It morphed into a more general blog, and I used it to communicate on a variety of issues - libraries, copyright, the internet, but particularly, just words. Over time, it became a blog mainly about language.
It lapsed in 2012 but I have decided to revive it, and it will be about language and maybe sometimes some other things. Neologisms are unavoidable and an endless source of interest and fun. Talking with a bilingual person, and attempting to learn a language, I have also become more vividly aware of the confusing strangeness of many idioms. I will post about idioms later.
Please promote it to your friends. My short-term goal is to attract a second follower, but I have longer term goals too.
Links
About Me
- Derek Whitehead
- Melbourne, Australia
- Derek is an Adjunct Professor at Swinburne University of Technology and at RMIT University, and the Chair of the Australian Digital Alliance. He retired in January 2015 as CIO and Director, Information Technology Services at Swinburne, and has had a long career as a librarian and copyright officer. He has had a long engagement with the internet since his involvement in the establishment of the pioneering Vicnet service in 1994. Derek was awarded an OAM in 2002 for services to libraries and the internet.
3 comments:
Does title creep occur in libraries because we like to be acknowledged for the complexity of our jobs? Unfortunately titles in libraries vary so much and they often meaningless to those outside of the profession or for that matter the organisation.
I would like more generic titles and PDs it would make life much easier.
I recently spied a vacancy for a Liaison Librarian position at UniMelb.
The title was: "Information Consultant, Information Awareness and Literacy Services".
Why not call a spade a spade?
Hi Derek
I spied an article recently on the concept of not library title creep but library mission creep ...
As Kim suggests, perhaps our 'title' creep is a response to our 'mission' creep ... we're trying to encompass so much in the field of librarianship that we want our titles to reflect our challenges.
For librarians, the issue of title partly boils down to whether or not we're willing to accept the brand of 'librarian' (as I am) or whether we feel the need to choose something with less stigma attached to it.
I've suggested before that some librarians are single-handedly responsible for perpetuating librarian stereotypes; in illustration of that point, see here and here).
Post a Comment